Bill Clinton and Racial Reconciliation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Bill Clinton and Racial Reconciliation - Essay Example Racial reconciliation demands sensitivity when being expounded because any loose definitions could lead people to supporting that which they feel closely relates to them. Yet it should be a unifying factor since it is a matter of humaneness rather than individual feelings. As human beings, we should seek to come together as one and respect each other regardless of color or any other divisive issues such as creed. However, emphasis must be placed on the fact that racial reconciliation primarily entails holding all persons responsible for the past injustices, accountable (Lawson 295). At the time of his campaign, Governor Bill Clinton came out boldly against race as a divisive issue and called upon Americans to embrace the diversity as a strengthening factor. Staying true to his word, when Clinton came into power he appointed more blacks and women than any other President in the history of America had. His idealism on racial reconciliation was founded on the fact that at the end of the day we are all human beings. That ought to be the connection we all ascribe to and not color. Racial reconciliation became more practical as President Clinton established a commission, aimed at convening dialogues at town halls to initiate further discourse into the issue of racism. He went on to enacting policies that saw employment opportunities for African Americans increase dramatically; besides that, he reinforced civil rights movements and appointed a significant number of African Americans and women into the judicial system. His dedication to this was visible until the end of his term where he was seen to make recommendations to health, education, civil rights efforts and overall social and economic evolution. In Elie Wiesel’s speech at the Millennium Lecture series in April 12 1999, he cited indifference as the greatest enemy to racial reconciliation as it is worse than anger and hatred, because it does not bring out any response. He applauded President Clintonâ€⠄¢s efforts in intervening the suffering of people in Kosovo in partnership with NATO. This had a huge impact on his plight to Americans that the human connection is greater than any racial and ethnic differences as nowadays more leaders and international organizations are embracing their roles as human beings to intervening in countries where crimes against humanity are rife. Such intervention efforts point at the occurrence of racial reconciliation (Wiesel). There are considerable instances of racial reconciliation in America, starting with President Clinton’s apology to African Americans for the Tuskegee Syphilis experiment in 1997. He also alluded to an apology to slavery and launched an initiative that sought to give practices necessary for racial reconciliation. This made racial injustices more acknowledgeable by other leaders as more apologies were offered. Evidence to this is an apology, in 1999 by President Mathieu Kerekou of Benin to African Americans for the countr y’s participation in the European slave trade. More recently, the Jacksonville Journey an initiative established in 2007 to reduce crime rates in the town often referred to as the ‘murder capital’ of Florida; where its activities include youth development programs that turn the young population away from gang activities. This has been a positive step towards racial reconciliation as it eliminates the stereotype of African Americans as inclined towards violent and criminal activities. Still in the same year, the

Networking and operating systems Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Networking and operating systems - Essay Example The users can interact with the operating systems by use of graphical user interface (GUI) or typing commands. There are three major operating systems, including Mac OS X, windows and Linux. Various companies are multitasking on i-OS4 instead of Blackberry devices. The i-OS4 ranks as the last mobile OS in supporting multitasking. The reason why the multitasking in Android is at last is because the designers entirely wanted to avoid it. The traditional multitasking cannot suit in Google phones and Androids because the limited resources and complexity. Complexity arises due to a simple UI and smaller visual space on mobile devices. There is no simple way of indicating to the user the running of the multiple applications. The device cannot also control or quit multiple applications (Raggo & Hosmer 2012, p. 97). Users often expect easy, simple and idiot-proof mobile devices. The second reason is inadequate resources. The phone uses memory and CPU to run everything, and in turn uses the battery power. Many of the apps, therefore, are not written or need to use all memory bytes or need of hitting the network in order to accomplish their tasks. Saving state is the most common Android’s form of multitasking. The OS of an Android provides a major support in the operating system in enabling the application developers to write the current condition of their applications and reload back when their app is restarted. The OS keeps the application in memory enhancing the switch back to fast. Running in the background is the less ordinary form of multitasking, particularly on the apps the want to continue in downloading twitter messages, playing music or performing other activities. Android supports all the types of apps where it allows them to register and run various services (Raggo & Hosmer 2012, p. 109). The entire background runs as a service thread,

Implications of Alcohol Abuse

Implications of Alcohol Abuse There are hundreds of car accidents and drinking related deaths every year due to irresponsible drinking. Many countries around the world face this problem with an abuse of alcohol. Alcohol in the hands of younger people may be a disaster, causing increasing crime related activity and harm, but the other hand is a more mature drinking age forcing delinquents to do illegal activities to obtain booze and drink more irresponsibly? These are questions that need to be answered through a research study in order to decrease the negativity associated with alcohol. The research will take place through the FIU library, Cypress Bay library and other various libraries using ebook references, providing statistics about consumption and its crimes. The purpose of this study is to find out which drinking age seems to be more appropriate for consumption which compares drinking ages among different countries to the negative consequences associated with them. The independent variable will be defined as the various ages of consumption among different countries. The dependent variable will be defined generally as the negative impacts of alcohol consumption, and the intervening variables are using the same age group, which will be 16 to 24, throughout the research study. I will be conducting a literature review to complete my study, which will involve me analyzing previous data collected and analyzing what that data means. I will analyze graphs about amount of alcohol consumed and alcohol related car accidents to find a correlation among the data and conclude what age is safer. Due to different cultures and environments, it may be difficult to include this factors into the study, as these factors will affect the validity of my findings. I conduct this study in the hopes it will further educate government officials to the importance of finding the right age of consumption in order to reduce fatalities and crimes, not only in the US but all around the world. This study will hopefully further the knowledge of potential dangers due to age restrictions to the general public. When concerning the United States, there seems to be statistical evidence that increasing the drinking age in 1984 has improved overall well being of people. During the 20th century, MLDA laws were drastically altered in the United States. Beginning in July 1988, the standard drinking age has been 21 throughout all of the United States. According to Surveys regarding alcohol consumption amongst high schoolers and young adults, drinking has declined since the 1970s, and the decline spiked in the early 90s. Looking at drivers that were killed between the ages 16 to 20, percentages with positive BACs went down from 61% in 1982 to 31% in 1995. Many studies conducted that analyzed the effects of drinking age changes revealed that an MLDA of 21 reduced alcohol consumption, alcohol abuse, drinking and driving, and alcohol related car accidents among youths. Still there is much underage drinking that still goes on, but increased enforcement of drinking age laws can limit underage drinking. R ecent attempts to lower drinking age to 18 and use alcohol education as a means of condemning misuse of alcohol have proven to show no evidence that education programs can have any effect on people, compared to the effect that the MLDA-21 has on people[1]. In regards to driving concerns, studies strongly suggest reducing the drinking age to 18 will dramatically increase driving under the influence and alcohol related car accidents resulting in death. One of the most favorable advantages of increasing the drinking age requirement was to reduce car accidents. When analyzing drivers between the ages of 16 and 20 years, the percentage testing for positive BACs went down from 61 in 1982, all the way to 31 in 1995. In a 1975 study, it showed that reducing the consumption age to 18 in two U.S. states and a Canadian province increased deadly crashes among individuals below 21 years old, juxtaposed with contiguous states where drinking ages werent altered. A 2001 report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that gathered the results of 33 studies reported 10 to 16 percent differences in end results for drivers 18-20 years old in alcohol related accidents. Amount of accidents went up when drinking ages were dropped and declined whe n ages went up. The impacts were unfluctuating during follow-up time periods ranging from 7 months to years. According to national roadside breath surveys, people driving at night on the weekends show an estimated 74% fall in blood alcohol concentrations of 0.05 percent or more when looking at individuals below the age of 21 during the period of 1973 to 1996. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration agrees that drinking age requirements should remain the same, stating earlier this year that adopting 21 policies in all states has saved more than 26,000 lives since the mid-1970s, including 4,441 lives amid the past 5 years. This finding is based on studies that found an average reduction of 13 percent in deadly crashes involving drivers 18-20 years old when drinking ages were increased. On the other hand, studies published by the Institute and others in 1983 found reductions in crashes regarding young drivers who were impacted by states going back to the age of 21. Many stud ies since then confirms the lifesaving benefits of 21 as the minimum drinking age. For example, in 1999 New Zealand reduced the consumption age from 20 to 18. A study that was published during 2006 revealed that accident injury rates among 18-19 year old men were 12 percent higher than expected after the policy was altered, based on comparisons with 20-24 year olds. The respective increase was even bigger for 18-19 year old females, at 51 percent, and higher injury rates also were seen for 15-17 year olds[2]. The MLDA or Minimum Legal Drinking age laws state the age at which a person can legally purchase and consume alcohol. The current MLDA in the United States is 21 years of age, however prior to the National Minimum Drinking Act of 1984, the legal drinking age varied from state to state. After every state acquired an age 21 MLDA, alcohol consumption during the prior month declined among individuals ages 18 to 20 from 59 percent in 1985 to 40 percent in 1991. Drinking declined dramatically for people ages 21 to 25 after the states adopted the age 21 MLDA, going from 70 percent in 1985 to 56 in 91. States that increased their legal drinking age to 21 saw a 16 % average decrease in car accidents. The chances for dropping out of high school were 13 times greater for states with a legal age of 18 in comparison with states with an age of 21[3]. The drinking age limit is based on research that reveals that young people act differently to alcohol than adults do. Teens get drunk twice as fast as adults do and do not know their limits of when to stop. Teens instinctively overdo drinking and binge more than adul ts do. By enforcing the drinking age of 21, it reduces car accidents, protects youths maturing brain from being negatively affected, and keeps younger people safer overall. Back when states had a lower legal drinking age in the U.S., the underage drinking problem was worse. Prior to the enactment of the MLDA of 21 in all states, underage age intoxicated drivers were involved in over twice as many fatal crashes as today. Although some may argue that since Europe has a lower drinking age they appear to be far better off than the United States. However, Studies show that Europe has worse problems in regards to drinking alcohol; Compared to America, Europe has more underage drinking, sexual abuse, injuries and problems in school due to alcohol. Due to easier access to alcohol in Europe, it increases the proportion of youths who drink alcohol in Europe[4]. Contrasted and an extensive variety of different projects and endeavors to lessen drinking among youngsters, expanding the legitimate age for buy and utilization of liquor to 21 seems to have been the best push to date (contrast examines condensed in Table I and studies refered to in surveys of other avoidance endeavors, for example, Moskowitz [1989] and Gorman and Speer [1996]). The extent of impacts of t he age-21 arrangement may seem little, especially in studies utilizing frail research plans and having low levels of measurable power. Be that as it may, even unassuming impacts connected to the whole populace of youth result in vast societal advantages. For instance, the National Highway Traffic Security Administration, utilizing a normal evaluated lessening in movement fatalities because of the legitimate drinking time of 13%, ascertains that the age-21 strategy averted 846 passings in 1997 and kept an aggregate of 17,359 passings since 1975 (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1998). An expansive extent of investigations of the MLDA found a factually critical, converse relationship between the MLDA and liquor utilization and liquor related issues (48% of the higher quality reviews). Just a modest number of studies found a measurably huge, positive relationship between the MLDA and different results (1% of the higher quality reviews). Countless found no measurably noteworthy relationship. Notwithstanding contrasts in nature of research plan and examinations, a few different components may represent changeability in results over considers, including size of test and degree of progress in strategy. The ability to identify a factually huge impact is straightforwardly affected by the span of the example. In a few states, the MLDA was raised just 1 year, from age 20 to age 21; in different states it was raised from age 18 to 21. Investigations of strategy changes that influence littler fragments of the populace might be less inclined to identify impacts just due to lessened factual power while examining less information. Given potential plan and investigation constraints in any single review, the huge extent of MLDA studies that found a huge backwards association with different results gives solid support for the adequacy of the MLDA. It is hard to gauge precisely the impacts of the drinking age particularly on undergrads. Tragically, most reviews concentrating on undergrads have been based on weaker cross-sectional outlines or constrained nonprobability tests. Just 9% of the school particular reviews (6 of 64) utilized a higher quality research plan. Of these higher quality thinks about, none found a factually huge opposite relationship between the MLDA and utilization or liquor related issues. Moreover, of these 6 investigations, 4 incorporated an example of understudies at just a single college. Despite the fact that it is conceivable that the age-21 strategy has been less successful on school grounds than among the general youth populace, existing exploration plainly does not propose that the age -21 MLDA has expanded issues among school understudies. In any case, more reviews that utilization powerful research plans would be expected to evaluate precisely the impact of the MLDA particularly on school grounds. Also, investigations of potential intervening elements on grounds are too required. For instance, how well are MLDA laws upheld on school grounds? How effortlessly can underage understudies get liquor close by grounds? In the event that one accept that the MLDA is less viable on school grounds, maybe it is because of careless requirement and especially simple access to liquor by underage youth in such settings. At long last, regardless of advance in late decades, generally youth keep on having access to liquor, most drink at any rate once in a while, whats more, a significant part routinely get to be distinctly inebriated. The social expenses from wounds, passings and harm related with underage drinking stay high. The advantages of the lawful drinking age of 21 have happened with almost no dynamic authorization in many ranges. Just by expanding implementation levels and discouraging grown-ups from offering on the other hand giving liquor to minors, significantly more wounds and passi ngs identified with liquor use among youth are probably going to be kept every year[5]. On the Contrary, lowering the age might not be a bad idea also, considering the limited impact that raising the legal age has on society and its individuals. Raising the MLDA does not stop underage people from consuming alcohol. Implementing a higher drinking age forces underage consumers to drink in secrecy and, in adolescents cases, without adult supervision from their elders. Roughly 90% of the drinking done by people between 18 to 20 years old is done in an irresponsible manner, that being binge drinking. Lowering the MLDA to 18 would allow for parents to teach their children how to drink responsibly, as opposed to drinking in private and being exposed to unsafe drinking habits. In the United States, a person is legally considered an adult at 18, making them liable for their own being and the choices that they make. If an adult is allowed to handle all the responsibilities and decisions for themselves such as entering the armed forces, voting, marrying, and even serving the jury, it is irrational for a so called adult not to be able to make the conscious and responsible decision for themselves to consume alcohol[7]. The legitimate drinking age ought to be brought down to around 18 or 19 and youthful grown-ups permitted to drink in controlled situations, for example, eateries, bars, bars and authority school and college capacities. In these circumstances capable drinking could be instructed through part displaying and instructive projects. Develop and sensible drinking conduct would be normal. This feeling is based upon research that I have been included in for more than a quarter century school age youth and the historical backdrop of savoring the United States and different societies. In spite of the fact that the lawful buy age is 21 years old, a larger part of understudies under this age devour liquor yet in a reckless way. This is on the grounds that drinking by these young is viewed as a tempting illegal natural product, an identification of insubordination to expert and an image of adulthood. As a country we have attempted preclusion enactment twice in the past for controlling flippant dri nking issues. This was amid National Prohibition in the 1920s and state disallowance amid the 1850s. These laws were at long last canceled in light of the fact that they were unenforceable and on the grounds that the reaction towards them brought about other social issues. Today we are rehashing history and committing similar errors that happened previously. Restriction did not work then and disallowance for youngsters less than 21 years old is not working at this point.The displaying of the present laws is promptly observed among college understudies. Those less than 21 years old will probably be overwhelming here and there called orgy consumers (devouring more than 5 drinks in any event once per week). For instance, 22% of all understudies under 21 contrasted with 18% more than 21 years old are substantial consumers. Among consumers just, 32% of under age contrasted with 24% of legitimate age are substantial consumers. Explore from the mid 1980s until the present has demonstrated a ceaseless abatement in drinking and driving related factors which has parallel the nations, and furthermore college understudies, diminish in per capita utilization. Be that as it may, these decreases began in 1980 under the steady gaze of the national 1987 law which com manded states to have 21 year old liquor buy laws. The reduction in drinking and driving issues are the aftereffect of many variables and not only the ascent in buy age or the diminished per capita utilization. These include: training concerning tipsy driving, assigned driver programs, expanded safety belt and air sack utilization, more secure vehicles, bring down speed limits, free taxi administrations from drinking foundations, and so forth.While there has been an abatement in per capita utilization and engine vehicle crashes, sadly, amid this same day and age there has been an INCREASE in different issues identified with overwhelming and flighty drinking among school age youth. The greater part of these announced practices indicated little change until AFTER the 21 year old law in 1987. For instance from 1982 until 1987 around 46% of understudies revealed retching subsequent to drinking. This hopped to more than half after the law change. Noteworthy increment were likewise found for different factors: playing hooky in the wake of drinking hopped from 9% to very nearly 12%; missing class due to aftereffect went from 26% to 28%; getting lower review due to drinking ascended from 5% to 7%; and been in a battle in the wake of drinking expanded from 12% to 17%. These practices are files of unreliable drinking. This expansion in harsh drinking conduct is because of underground drinking outside of grown-up supervision in understudy rooms and lofts were same age people gather and due to absence of learning of dependable drinking practices. Based upon the way that our present preclusion laws are not working, the requirement for option comes closer from the experience of other, and more antiquated societies, who dont have these issues should be attempted. Gatherings, for example, Italians, Greeks, Chinese and Jews, who have few drinking related issues, tend to share some normal qualities. Liquor is neither seen as a toxic substance or an enchantment intense, there is next to zero social weight to drink, flighty conduct is never endured, youngsters take in at home from their folks and from different grown-ups how to deal with liquor in a capable way, there is societal accord on what constitutes capable drinking. Since the 21 year old drinking age law is not working, and is counterproductive, it profits us as a country to change our present restriction law and to educate capable drinking systems for the individuals who expended mixed refreshments[8]. On April 14, 1982, President Reagan set up the Presidential Commission Against Drunk Driving (PCDD). This commission built up 39 suggestions to control what was seen to be a plastered driving pandemic. Taken together, the 39 proposals were expected to be far reaching approach with an object ive of lessening the quantity of liquor related passings on the countrys roadways. Proposal number eight concerned the Minimum Legal Purchasing Age, and said that all states ought to raise their drinking age to 21, keeping in mind that they lose a specific rate of government roadway dollars. In spite of the fact that the objective of the Commissions proposals was planned to be inebriated driving over the grown-up populace, the unbalanced measure of consideration paid to building up 21 as the national least drinking age moved the countrys concentration to youngsters drinking. Select enthusiasm for raising the drinking age underestimated the impact of the rest of the 38 proposals, among them recommendations to execute youth instruction programs, build up an enormous open data crusade, and to expand punishments for indicted plastered drivers. Regarding liquor hindered driving and related fatalities, a current NHTSA concentrate that looked at DUI laws in the United States to those in pr actically identical countries, for example, the European Union States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, and Brazil, found that the United States had the most noteworthy extent of activity fatalities that were liquor related among the 12 nations detailing information. A similar review found that the United States has the most elevated lawful BAC confine for hindered driving-.10 at the season of production (2000)- and generally careless requirement when contrasted with countries like Australia, New Zealand, Sweden, and Spain where obligatory irregular breath testing and temperance checkpoints were accounted for to be visit and common. The legitimate drinking age of all nations in the report was 18, with Japan and Canada being the main special cases. Japan sets 20 as its legitimate farthest point, while the lawful savoring age Canada is 19 in all areas aside from Alberta, Quebec, and Manitoba, where individuals can drink legitimately at age 18. In both the here and now and the long haul, liquor impacts the juvenile mind in courses not quite the same as the grown-up cerebrum. Puberty, extensively characterized as the second decade of life, neurologically stretches out until the age of 25. In a condition of liquor hindrance (here and now impacts), the immature cerebrum is debilitated in routes like the grown-up mind however to contrasting degrees. In different creature explores, the immature mind demonstrates more prominent liquor prompted weakness of memory recovery and engraving abilities than the grown-up cerebrum. This is to state that the immature mind is more regrettable at recollecting things while intoxicated, and recalling things that happened while tipsy. Contrastingly, the pre-adult mind is less weakened in engine ability control than the grown-up cerebrum. That is, the youthful cerebrum keeps up a more elevated amount of adjust, response time, and deftness while under an indistinguishable level of weakness from a grown-up mind. Since it is unscrupulous to supply liquor to those beneath the savoring age a lab setting, specialists are compelled to utilize rats for exploratory trials. Any use of these discoveries to people is fundamentally to some degree theoretical. Concerning long haul impacts, exploratory rodent lab confirm demonstrates that rehashed introduction to liquor amid youthfulness prompts to enduring shortfalls in psychological capacities, including learning and memory. Comes about because of human reviews are less evident. Cerebrum outputs and estimations of liquor influenced regions of the mind in youthful young people with liquor mishandle scatters indicate bring down rates of mind action amid memory errands and less created mind structures than in non-drinking peers. In spite of the fact that the outcomes are disturbing, they are steady with discoveries from more established, non-juvenile subjects. Subsequently, the intellectual deficiencies credited to liquor use in teenagers are demonstrative not of liquors extraordinary impact amid young people, but rather of the outcomes of overwhelming liquor utilize all the more by and large. Many reviews affirm that since the drinking age was institutionalized at 21 in 1984, the general number of liquor related fatalities for those matured 18-20 has diminished. In any case, this example of decay started in the mid 1970s, years before section of the National Minimum Drinking Age Act. In spite of the fact that associations like MADD case the 21 year-old drinking age has spared more than 21,000 lives since the mid-1980s, its is difficult to attest a circumstances and end results relationship between the adjustment in the law and the decrease in liquor related movement fatalities; numerous different elements, for example, more secure vehicles and more stringent tipsy driving laws have assumed an unquestionably imperative part (see beneath). A few researchers have additionally introduced the imperative contention that while passings out and about may have declined pointedly among 18-20 year-olds in the years taking after establishment of the 21 year-old drinking age, the slowest rate of decay and most prominent number of yearly fatalities is seen every year in the 21-24 age amass. In 2002, for instance, twice the same number of 21 year-olds kicked the bucket in liquor related car collisions as 18 year-olds. Such a stunning measurement says a lot: an arrangement that cases to spare a large number of every year may essentially be re-appropriating passings over the life cycle to the time when it gets to be distinctly lawful to drink liquor-age 21. Amid the 1990s, authoritative changes, expanded law requirement, harder indictment and discipline, exceedingly obvious promotion, and state funded training were all parts of the war on intoxicated driving. Other administrative changes, for example, compulsory safety belt laws, bring down BAC limits, and stricter principles on vehicle security benchmarks can likewise be credited. The decrease in liquor related fatalities found in the United States in the course of the last over two decades is inferable from a blend of components, including yet not restricted to more secure vehicles, expanded open consciousness of the threat of smashed driving, utilization of assigned drivers-a term that did not exist in the before the drinking age was raised-balance checkpoints, zero-resistance laws for youthful drivers, and by and large more stringent implementation of liquor disabled driving laws have prompted to the lessening found in rates of inebriated driving and related passings. Truth be told, a considerable lot of these changes can be followed to the 39 suggestions introduced by the Presidential Commission Against Drunk Driving in 1982. As indicated by an investigation by NHTSA, seat straps and air sacks have had an immeasurably more prominent impact in counteracting fatalities than the 21 year-old drinking age; for instance, in 2002 and 2003 alone, more lives out an d about were spared by the utilization of seat straps and airbags than there were in the whole history of the 21 year-old drinking age. Mediations in the course of recent years have succeeded not just in decreasing the frequency of disabled driving and the accidents and fatalities that can come about because of it, additionally in changing the standards identified with driving in the wake of drinking. Tipsy driving is no longer for the most part acknowledged in the public arena, offering ascend to assigned drivers and less plastered drivers on todays streets[9].

The Authenticity of Hecate in Macbeth Essay -- Macbeth essays

The Authenticity of Hecate in Macbeth      Ã‚  Ã‚   The authenticity issue of Macbeth's Hecate endures. Recent critics still argue about whether the scenes are Shakespearean, why they are or are not, and what the implications are one way or the other. Some critics cling to the authenticity of the Folio while others wave their copies of Middleton's "The Witch" in protest. The modern director and reader then will find no clear direction to read or not to read from textual scholarship. Instead, would-be travellers to the world of Macbeth had better consider their options and ask specifically: what does Hecate add with her appearance and how do these additions impact the play?    Some critics have made the mistake of trying to dismiss Hecate as a fetching song-and-dance girl. In his Introduction to Macbeth, editor Kenneth Muir remarks: "The Hecate passages were clearly invented to introduce the songs and Middleton is usually blamed for these insertions" (xxxiii). But more recent critics like Henri Suhamy take umbrage with both the form and the substance of this argument. Suhamy notes: "the direction printed in italics in the Folio, after line 33 (III,v)--"Musicke, and a Song"--does not mention any identifiable song, contrary to what is indicated by most editors" (274). Stallybrass seems also to believe that Hecate is there to dance, but at least he credits her with a particularly important number: "the dance of Hecate and the six Witches gives a concrete dramatization of the 'deed without a name' (IV.i.49) which reverses the whole order of 'Nature'" (200). What Hecate's interpolation really supplies, however, is order and much more: balance, authority, direct ion, and reason are all part of the substance she provides.    .. ...ologie." In Minor Prose Works. Ed. James Craigie. Edinburgh: Scottish Text Society, 1982. Muir, Kenneth. "Introduction." In Macbeth. Ed. Kenneth Muir. New York: Routledge, 1992. Palmer, D.J. "'A new Gorgon': visual effects in Macbeth." In Focus on Macbeth. Ed. John Russell Brown. Boston: Routledge, 1982. Perkins, William. The Damned Art of Witchcraft. (xeroxed copy) Shakespeare, William. Macbeth. Ed. Kenneth Muir. New York: Routledge, 1992. Stallybrass, Peter. "Macbeth and Witchcraft." In Focus on Macbeth. Ed. John Russell Brown. Boston: Routledge, 1982. Suhamy, Henry. "The Authenticity of the Hecate Scenes in Macbeth : Arguments and Counter-Arguments." In French Essays on Shakespeare and His Contemporaries: 'What Would France With Us?" Ed. Jean Marie Maguin and Michele Willems. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1995.   

Medical expenses †deductibility in personal income taxation

Federal Income tax code specifies the generally deductible expenses in the personal taxation of an individual which include medical expenses, certain taxes, mortgage interest, investment interest and charitable contributions. These deductions mentioned in the chapter are known as itemized deductions. It has to be noted that any expenditures not specifically allowed as itemized deductions are not allowable against the personal income subject to tax. Medical expenses paid out by the taxable individual on himself, spouse and dependents are allowed as an itemized deduction. The additional points to be noted are that the deduction is allowed only to the extent to which the medical expenses are not reimbursed and the deduction is limited to 7.5% of the taxpayers Adjusted Gross Income. 1.0   DEFINITION OF MEDICAL EXPENSES The definition of medical expenses is very broad to cover not only the expenses incurred for the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of the disease but also covers expenses incurred for preventive health cover and costs of periodic physical and dental examinations of the taxpayer. The important point here is that such deductions are allowed even when the taxpayer is in good health. Hence, such medical expenses incurred for the treatment of diseases affecting any structure or function of the body are termed as medical expenses for the purpose of assessing the income for tax purposes. 2.0   COSMETIC SURGERY-DEDUCTIBILITY Expenses incurred for Cosmetic Surgery are deductible when the surgery is necessary to ameliorate a deformity arising from a congenial abnormality or a personal injury or A disfiguring disease. Any medical expenses incurred on cosmetic surgery for purposes other than those which are unnecessary are not deductible. For example, fees paid to a cosmetic surgeon for a face lift of a person of 75 years age to improve his appearance is unnecessary and hence not deductible. But the cost of restoring the face by cosmetic surgery, which is disfigured in an accident, is deductible. 3.0   DEDUCTIBILITY OF CERTAIN OTHER EXPENSES 4.1 COSTS INCURRED IN A NURSING HOME/HOME FOR AGED When a person is admitted in a nursing home or home for the aged primarily to get medical care, then the expenses incurred for the nursing home expenses including meals and lodging are allowable as a deduction. However if the primary concern for being admitted to the nursing home or the home for aged is personal, only the expenses paid for medical or cursing is deductible, whereas, costs of lodging and meals are not deductible. 4.2 TUITION EXPENSES When a dependent is sent to a school having special resources for alleviating the infirmities caused by mental or physical disability, the tuition expenses paid to the school is an allowable deduction. In such cases, the cost of meals and lodging in addition to the tuition fees is allowable. 4.3 MEDICAL EXPENSES INCURRED FOR SPOUSE AND DEPENDENTS A taxpayer is entitled to claim the deduction in his adjusted gross income of the medical expenses incurred by him on his/her spouse and for a person who is dependent on him/her at the time such expenses were incurred. Again the dependency is to be determined on the basis of certain criteria as spelt out in the Act and the schedules. 4.4 EXPENSES INCURRED ON TRANSPORTATION, MEALS AND LODGING FOR MEDICAL TREATMENT Transportation costs like bus, taxi, train or plane fare, charges for ambulance services and out of pocket expenses for the use of an automobile for commuting to and from a point of treatment for medical care are deductible. The taxpayer is entitled to choose either a mileage allowance or actual out-of-pocket automobile expenses. Deduction is allowed for the related parking fees and toll charges, whereas the cost of meals, en route are not allowed as a deduction. Similarly the cost of transportation of a parent accompanying a sick child or a nurse or other attendant accompanying a person who is traveling to get medical care is allowable, provided it is so that the patient can not travel alone and needs an aid to accompany during the journey. The Lodging expenses which are incurred essentially for medical care, when the medical care is provided by a doctor in a licensed hospital or clinic are allowed as deduction. No lavish or extravagant lodging expenses involving significant element of personal pleasure recreation or vacation in the travel away from home is allowed as deduction. The limit for such lodging expenses eligible for deduction is $50 per night for the patient as well as the person who must accompany the patient. 4.5 ALLOWABILITY MEDICAL INSURANCE PREMIUMS AS DEDUCTION The maximum limit of 7.5 % of the adjusted gross income of the taxpayer allowable as deduction include the medical insurance premiums, irrespective of the fact that such premiums are paid under a group or individual plan. When the medical insurance premium is paid by the employer such premium is not included in the income of the taxpayer and it cannot be included in the employee’s medical expense either. Insurance premiums paid by a self employed person are allowed as a business income. The premium paid for the spouse and dependents also qualify for deduction. Premiums paid by companies on their employees health care is allowed as business expenditure for the companies concerned. 4.0   DEDCUTION OF CAPITAL EXPENDITURES INCURRED FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES When swimming is a part of a medical treatment and there is no availability of a neighborhood pool then the capital expenses incurred on constructing such pool will become eligible for deduction. Similarly a Window Air-conditioner which is not permanent in nature, dust elimination system, elevators and a room built to house an iron lung are some of the examples of allowable capital expenditure. The basic criteria in determining the allowability of such expenditure is that they are required as medical necessity upon the advice of a doctor or physician, the facility is used primarily by the patient alone and the expenditure is reasonable. Similarly expenditure like constructing entrance and exit ramps to the residence widening hallways and doorways to accommodate wheelchair, installing support bars and railings in bathrooms and other living rooms and adjusting any electrical outlets or fixtures offer themselves eligible for deduction provided that the expenditure is incurred to enable a physically handicapped individual live independently and productively. If a capital expenditure is allowed as a medical expense, then the allowable cost is deductible in the year incurred. All these expenses are allowed subject to the overall ceiling of 7.5% of the adjusted gross income. 5.0   DEDUCTION ARE ALLOWED ON A CASH BASIS Whatever be the method of accounting adopted by the individual, the medical expenses are deductible on a cash basis. This means that the are deductible only in the year in which they are paid with an exception in the case of deceased person, when the expenses are paid within a year of death then the expenses would be deemed to have paid at the time when they are incurred. Deduction is not allowed currently for any medical expenses that is going to be incurred in the future, subject of course to the exception that the taxpayer has an obligation to pay the fees in advance under the policy of the physician or the institution furnishing the medical care.                                                          Works Cited          â€Å"Hoffman, Smith, Wills – Individual income taxes 2007 Chapter 10 pp 10-2 to 10-8 West Federal Taxation (Thomson)         

The Influence of Greek Pottery Art on Modern Art

In â€Å"Herakles writes home† we can see how Marian Maguire has used Greek mythological figures taken from ancient Greek vases and put them into the scenes of New Zealand’s colonization and conflict with Maori to show the effects of the British settlers had on the shaping of New Zealand’s fate be it negative or positive depending on the viewpoint of the viewers. The pot Maguire uses in â€Å"Herakles writes home† is a black figure Volute Krater similar in shape to the Black-figure Volute Krater made by an Anonymous Greek painter between 525  and 500  BC.The Pot shares many resemblances with the one used in Herakles writes home which lets me make the assumption that the shape of the pot in the lithograph is a Volute Krater. Both of their middle body pieces are the in shape with large top which gets smaller the further towards the bottom it goes but Black figure Volute Krater has more of a slant to where it reaches the base piece whereas the pot in Magu ire’s lithograph has a sharp change in angle where it reaches the bottom.The bottom piece in the two pots is again similar with some variation between the two. The pot in the Herakles writes home has a flatter band around the base of it which allows for it to have a decorative band in it unlike the Black figure Volute Krater. The band below the top band in the Volute Krater is practically the same in shape to the one used in the Pot in the Herakles writes home Lithograph the only difference is the Black figure Volute Krater lacks decoration there.The top band of the two pots is similar but there is a bigger difference between them than most of the other parts of the pot. In the Pot in the Herakles writes home lithograph the top band is joined at the sides to the handles whereas the Black Figure Volute Krater’s handles don’t meet at the sides of the top band they are joined to the top of the pot, The top band is similar in shape to each other though the Black Fig ure Volute Black figure Volute Krater 525-500 BC, Anonymous Greek painter.Black figure Volute Krater 525-500 BC, Anonymous Greek painter. Krater does have more of slant to it. Where the handles come out of the pot there is the biggest difference. In Herakles writes home the handles come out of the pot and keep their shape and decoration the same through the whole handle whereas the handles come out of the pot black and smaller than the ends of the handles in the Black Figure Volute Krater then change into orangey/red with patterns and thicker handles. Even with those differences t is clear that the figure of the original Black figure Volute Krater has influenced what the shape of the pot in Maguire’s lithograph and that it is clearly an Attic Volute Krater. Handle of an Attic red-figure volute-Krater, 450–440 BC depicting the double ivory leaf pattern. Handle of an Attic red-figure volute-Krater, 450–440 BC depicting the double ivory leaf pattern. The decorative feature on the pot in the Herakles writes is clearly influenced by other classical pots but Maguire has incorporated them into a unique way.The handles on the pot in the Herakles writes home lithograph are double ivy leaf but not the traditional ones you find on ancient Greek pot’s Maguire has put a twist on it by replacing the ivy leave shape with that of the Kowhai tree which is native to New Zealand (Something about what it shows about something) Another decoration in the pot that bears classical influence is the chevron pattern on the foot of the pot depicted in Maguire’s lithograph similar to the pattern around the top of the Persephone painter’s red-figure bell-Krater. 440 B. C. Red-figure Bell-Krater Attributed to the Persephone Painter 440 B. C. ; Red-figure Bell-Krater Attributed to the Persephone Painter What’s interesting about the pattern is that the leaves used are that they are olive tree leaves arranged I a way that it looks like an olive wreath. The reason Maguire has chosen to use an olive wreath in this particular artwork is that an olive wreath signifies being victorious and also peace as in the ancient Greek Olympic Games the winners of events were awarded Olive Wreaths from wild-olive leafs from a sacred tree near the temple of Zeus at Olympia.Maguire used this as a symbol because it creates a contrast between the settlers and England at that time, as Herakles was the son of Zeus it gives a family link between the figure of Herakles in place of a settler on the pot and the wreath is a symbol of Zeus who being the father of Herakles would be in the Place of Settler period England. The presence of the wreath also signifies the victory of the Maori population of new Zealand which if in the Ancient Olympic Games the two cultures, Maori and Settler, would have een awarded to the victor which in this case was the settlers, this can be backed up by the relaxed and post battle/victorious feel of the scene on the belly of the pot. Bottom of the Herakles Attacking a Centaur, Greek, Athens, about 530–520 B. C pot depicting stylised rays. Bottom of the Herakles Attacking a Centaur, Greek, Athens, about 530–520 B. C pot depicting stylised rays.The next feature on the pot on Maguire’s lithograph was stylised rays, but not as the same as the classical Greek stylised rays depict iced on the picture to the left but with a European/settler twist. Maguire has put in Settler Farming tools In the place of the classical Greek’s rays. This drastic change to what normally would have gone in there leaves us wondering why she would change this.The reason behind this would be that it shows how drastic the change the settlers bought in on New Zealand and replaced the old with their new stuff leaving little evidence of the old but its adapted style and structure. Greek pot depicting Herakles and the Nemean Lion Aegisthus Painter 470 B. C. Greek pot depicting Herakles and the Nemean Lion Ae gisthus Painter 470 B. C. Herakles was perhaps the most glorified and famous Greek hero who achieved immortality due to his feats and Maguire has used this image of Herakles to reinforce the ideas she is conveying.The idea of Herakles as his own man is perhaps the misconceived thing about him as his twelve labours were directed by Eurystheus, the king of Tiryns and Mycenae on the command of Apollo after killing his wife and children in a fit of madness Hera induced in him, but it is important to point out that even though he was under the command of Eurytheus he did it of his own free will and by completing these twelve labours he became the greatest hero in all of Greek mythology.By skilfully using Herakles in the place of settlers Maguire has given us a better understanding of the message she is conveying. One of the main things about Herakles being the Greek mythological figure Maguire used is the fact that he was an instrument to complete the tasks of Eurystheus which the settle rs were to England merely tools to complete tasks for their own benefit.In the case of Herakles he built up his own â€Å"Kleos† by completing these feats and intimidating Eurythesus causing Eurythesus to fear for his life â€Å"Amazed at his manhood, Eurystheus forbade him thenceforth to enter the city, but ordered him to exhibit the fruits of his labours before the gates. They say, too, that in his fear he had a bronze jar made for himself to hide in under the Amazed at his manhood, Eurystheus forbade him thenceforth to enter the city, but ordered him to exhibit the fruits of his labours before the gates.They say, too, that in his fear he had a bronze jar made for himself to hide in under the earth† Apollodorus, the ancient writer who collected legends in his mythology handbook, the  library, this may not be a completely true tale as Myths handed down orally and weren’t physically recorded until late after their creation which makes bits of the Myth liable t o changes because of a sort of Chinese whisper effect. This is similar to the situation with the settlers and England latter on http://art. thewalters. org/detail/13467 http://art. thewalters. org/detail/13467

Nader for President essays

Nader for President essays Well one big reason Ralph Nader should be president is because the whole left wing right wing game was a sham, Democrats and their false liberalism, Republicans and their horrible conservatism. I think we need to go to the extreme left wing, back to grassroots campaigns and honest politicians. Washington does not belong to the government, nor to the people. Washington is corporate occupied territory, Democrats and Republicans are just a facade for Big Business. They can deny it forever the fact still remains that both parties accept money from special interest groups. Unlike the rest of the Presidential hopefuls, Ralph Nader is not running his campaign based on fear. Republicans play on the fear of terrorism and Democrats play on the fear of Bush. Ralph Nader says America should vote on conscience. Would you consider making up your mind before you hear the facts an ignorant thing to do? Well thats what party politics is, a bunch of people with no opinion of their own, They are puppets that stand with their party on almost every issue. You and I both know that we are conservative about some things and liberal about others. For instance Im conserative on the issue of murder rates in the country, but Im liberal about J-walking. At the rate we are goin we wont have a country left to enjoy our freedom on, No other presidential hopeful seems to realize how Important the enviroment is except Ralph Nader. The other canidates are worried about the money, but they dont realize that ther is no economy without ecology. ...